1. We made it! Our 2011/2012 donation drive was a success, and our VPS server is set for the next 12 months. Here's to a great 2012!
  2. Our forum has been upgraded to XenForo version 1.1. You may find a couple of new features and enhancements as you visit the forum. If anything looks or functions incorrectly, or if you have any questions, please let us know. Thanks!
  3. Did you know? Hover over this notice. See the "X" in the upper right corner as you hover? This will "dismiss" the current notice. A few important notices can sometimes not be dismissed, but most can. You can restore all notices through your user panel.
  4. Join The Gold Club!

    The Gold Club gives you the opportunity to enhance your forum experience while also helping us out!
    Want to upload images with your posts or get a custom title under your name?
    The Gold Club has you covered!

    View all of the details here, or click here to subscribe to the Gold Club now!
  1. Chris-An Ordinary Fool Active Member

    I'd like to hear your opinions.

    Why do you think Karen sounds so good on this album. I was listening to this in my car the other day. I bought a sealed LP awhile ago and burned it to a CDR, personally I think it sounds 100 x's better than any CD version I own.

    I then re-read the fans Q/A that says:
    I always heralded Horizon as my favorite Carpenters album. Why were there only ten songs?
    Richard: I agree with the thought that the album should have had more material, and in fact " Tryin' to Get The Feeling Again" was cut for it. In retrospect this should have been included, however I felt there were too many ballads. Karen and I were overbooked and low on energy. Our touring schedule was really unrealistic, and by September we ended up with Karen, already struggling with anorexia nervosa, in the hospital. We postponed two major tours, the European and the Japanese. At this time most albums by major artists had included ten songs anyway. Despite all this, Horizon is impeccably produced, with Karen never singing and sounding better and the album brilliantly engineered by the late Roger Young.


    The opinions I'd like to hear are in regard to how was Richard able to get Karen to sound so amazing on this album. For me she sounds so different (but in a good way) I swear that Solitaire is just perfection, the way it builds to the middle and then gets better, the chorus is almost hypnotic for me toward the end. Was it just the time in Karen's like that she could do this or was it the material being melancholy or was it the recording studio or a different mic used by Karen.

    It's funny how Richard says that Trying to Get the Feeling was suppose to be included cause when you hear that (although it was a work lead) Karen has "THAT" same Horizon sound and I could see that song fitting right in with not only the theme of the album but the way she sounded as a whole.

    What do you think?
  2. mstaft Member

    I agree, Horizon is amazing. Wish there were more tracks on it. Although "Trying" was cut for the album, I always thought "Ordinary Fool" would have been a better complement to the rest of the songs. If I remember correctly, "Only Yesterday" is the only other song besides "Postman" to include horns or woodwinds. Ordinary Fool could have brought a nice balance. For those interested, my review of Horizon is at http://insightsandsounds.blogspot.com/2009/02/horizon-review-carpenters-masterpiece.html.
  3. cam89 Member

    They also were able to use 48 tracks too, right? Maybe that's what gave it THAT sound!!
  4. At that point, only 24 tracks of recording were possible. It later became possible to chain two together to make 48 analog tracks but this wasn't possible in 1975.

    Ed
  5. cam89 Member

    Sorry, that's what I meant....24 tracks.
  6. Hammerandnails New Member

    according to Carpenters Fan Club Newsletter #42 in the bio re: Tony Peluso - " Tony has recently written 2 songs, Sailing On The Tide and Happy. Both songs will be on Carpenters new album. " I remember reading that and was wondering why "Sailing On The Tide" wasn't on the LP when I got it.

    This is such a buoyant, upbeat tune that this would have truly balanced the somber but brilliant "Horizon". I am going to include this on my next CDR while adding "Trying To Get The Feeling" to the "Horizon" chronological order.

    As for the bookended "Aurora" and "Eventide" - they ARE BEAUTIFUL - but I never really considered them as "songs" and when "Eventide" finished after the first listening - I felt like I was waiting for more. And we had been waiting (selfishly) for new Carpenter product and all we got were EIGHT really polished pieces!. . . .Hence - "Trying To Get The Feeling" and "Sailing On The Tide" were MAYBE the pieces I was probably looking for !
    Just my thoughts -

    Quick question - where was it discovered that "Ordinary Fool" was recorded during the HORIZON sessions? Thanks in advance
  7. Harry Administrator

    Initial Reaction

    I always thought the the concept of HORIZON was brilliant, but felt let down by the execution of it all by the time we get through Side Two. Side One held much promise with the bookended and gorgeous "Aurora" opening things off.

    Then one of my personal favorites "Only Yesterday" gets the real proceeding off to a rousing start, followed by the slow "Desperado".

    Now "Desperado" is such a slow ballad that really drags the album down a lot. I love Karen's reading of the song, and the production is impeccable, but it IS a real downer.

    But "Please Mr. Postman" livens things up again nicely, with the sumptuously-produced nod to old-fashioned standards "I Can Dream Can't I" closing out the first side.

    Side One v. Side Two

    I can still remember my first experience with the album when it was brand new, eagerly listening to Side One while the family packed for a vacation. I needed to do my packing too, and did so while Side Two was being silently dubbed onto tape so I could listen to it later on the vacation. My eagerness to hear Side Two after the wonderful Side One had peaked. And all I had to go on at that point were the titles:

    "Solitaire", I wasn't sure what to expect.

    A song called "Happy" would surely be an uptempo Carpenters cooker.

    And the next song had a parenthetical phrase in the opening "(I'm Caught Between)..." just like their first big hit "(They Long To Be).." so I thought surely that song would fit that pattern.

    Even a song called "Love Me For What I Am" helds promise of getting back to what I enjoyed about Carpenters music - the uptempo tracks, the wild overdubs, the tight harmonies.

    Then when we ultimately got where we were going, and I finally got to listen to Side Two, it was somewhat of a letdown, and one that almost holds to this day. To me, the album seemed unbalanced, with the two "cookers" having to balance out Side One, which they do beautifully, but then the album ran out of gas before Side Two is finished.

    While I like "Solitaire" a lot - and even moreso after hearing the single version released on GOLD, I've come to appreciate the recording for what it is. But back then, it was even more slow and plodding than "Desperado", and I couldn't believe that both were included on the same album. Thankfully they weren't on the same side!

    But in the CD age, they're only three tracks apart, separated by the wildly uptempo "...Postman" and another slow ballad of "I Can Dream...". So things really grind to a halt here, leaving the remaining songs of Side Two to pick things up a bit.

    While "Happy" should be up to the task of picking things up, somehow it doesn't quite get the job done for me. It's a pleasant enough tune, with some faster pacing, but for some reason it's never thrilled me. It always felt like something was missing. But that could be a matter of personal taste.

    The remaining two songs turn out to be pleasant ballads, but not powerful enough to over come the heavy weight of having "Desperado", "Solitaire", and "I Can Dream Can't I" coming before them.

    The album ends gorgeously with the bookended "Eventide" wrapping the whole thing up like a present. But to me, the gift inside was perhaps the wrong size.

    Overall

    I've warmed up to HORIZON over the years. When a lead singer of Karen's caliber is taken from us, we learn to cherish what she DID produce for us, so I now consider HORIZON much more highly than I did when it first came out.

    As for Chris' original question, I don't know what makes the "sound" of the album and Karen's vocals so good here. And make no mistake, I don't think she ever sounded more technically perfect than she does here. If I had to guess, I'd credit Roger Young and Ray Gerhardt, the engineers, along with Bernie Grundman the original mastering engineer, for making a piece of vinyl that sounds superb.

    And HORIZON does indeed sound wonderful on vinyl. If you can find a clean copy and have a turntable hooked up, by all means give it a listen. You'll find that it beats any CD ever made.

    Harry
  8. Song4uman Member

    I agree that the vinyl sounds better than the CDs that I own. I love vinyl....

    I also have always thought that Karen never sounded better than on Horizon. Just the other day I was wondering what types of mics were used on that album.....such a different sound than the albums before and after. To me there is such a presence....and a thick, warm tone....

    Very different sound than say, on Made in America.....I love some of the songs on that album, but they have such thin sounding vocals.....maybe just the mics used????
    jonathan
  9. Mike Blakesley Administrator

    I agree that Karen sounds fantastic on HORIZON. She had really matured as a singer, and technology was able to contribute as well - recording techniques finally matched up with the awesomeness of her voice.

    Still I was somewhat let down by the album. I was surprised that "Postman" was included, since it had been out for months as a single and it had been pretty overexposed on radio. (And besides, artists at that time would occasionally release singles that were not included on a subsequent album.)

    I thought a lot of the album had a bit of an overproduced sound, like it was tinkered with too much. I missed the seques, shifts in tone and variety of sounds that were included on albums like A SONG FOR YOU and CLOSE TO YOU. I missed having a Richard vocal or two to lighten things up. I guess to put it simply, for me at least, the album wasn't as much fun to listen to as the previous ones had been. It got too serious.

    I've said this before -- my favorite thing about that album is its cover. But, I do agree that there isn't a better showcase for Karen's vocals out there.

    (edited to fix a couple of typos)
  10. goodjeans Member

    I love this album from cover to cover. What I find most intriguing is that...except for the 'stamped' decal identifying both artist and album title, it is nameless. I wonder if there was a message in that.
  11. mstaft Member

    FYI- "Ordinary Fool" was recorded in 1976, from what I remember. It could have been on included on Hush.
  12. djn Member

    Flashback to '69 and follow Karen's voice thru-out and studio aside she had matured far beyond Rainy Days and A Song For You. She was at her peak during HORIZON and with the exception of CHRISTMAS PORTRAIT I hear a steady thinning of the vocals from then on. When I want to be enveloped by Karen Carpenter I listen to the HORIZON recording sessions. Yes the lp was a bit draggy but Karen shines as a vocalist and shows a glimmer of where good health and wellness would've taken her.

    Jeff
  13. Song4uman Member

    I love Christmas Portrait too......it sounds the closest to Horizon.....
  14. newvillefan Member

    As much as I love 'Made In America', I have always thought the quality of Karen's vocals is not as warm, full and rich as it is on say, Horizon. I think that comes down to three factors:

    1. Karen's voice had matured, but also thinned due perhaps to her illness.
    2. The microphones used may not have been the same.
    3. The mastering of the album is not as good (despite it being the most expensive non-Christmas album they made).

    BUT: the big contradiction to #1 and #2 is that, if you listen to an outtake like 'The Uninvited Guest', compared to a track from the finished album like 'Somebody's Been Lying', there's a world of difference.

    What I'm trying to say, is that I think on 'The Uninvited Guest', that warm, rich vocal is back, in fact it probably was there all along, but I think the final recordings mixed and sweetened on MIA don't convey this quality. I think it's a problem with the overall album. It's at it's most prevalent on '(Want You) Back In My Life Again', where Karen's voice is the thinnest and lightest I have ever heard her sound.
  15. mstaft Member

    ^^ In my opinion, MIA was the Carps struggling for a hit- and being willing to do whatever it took to get one.
  16. toeknee4bz Member

    ??? Let down? Overproduced? No way. HORIZON is my all-time Carpenters favorite. It's all about reverb. Echo. Yeah! You're right, though. Karen's voice had matured, and technology was definitely on her side as well.

    And as for Richard, [I'm certain that he would agree] his wizardry was all over the place with the arrangement of HORIZON, including some BGVs... with the exception of "I Can Dream, Can't I", which he apparently had nothing to do with, according to the credits. Billy May? Talk about a head switch after "Postman"! Anyway, Richard does sing very well in his own right, but as he admitted himself, "Karen is clearly the star". And this proves it conclusively in my book.

    Tony
  17. Harry Administrator

    Mike and I are apparently on the about the same page with the "letdown" terminology. HORIZON didn't fit the mold of the albums that made us fans. It was different, and it took me a long while to warm up to it.

    I don't think of it as overproduced though. Indeed, underproduced is more the way I initially felt about it. Where were the soaring multipart overdubs like on prior albums? There were some, but not to the degree that we found on OFFERING through NOW AND THEN.

    It appeared to me, as if HORIZON was the beginning of what could be called the Karen-solo period of Carpenters. Richard's vocal parts were drastically cut, reduced to occasional backing vocals. It sounds, like Tony said, that HORIZON was the first album following Richard's realization the "Karen was the star."

    For those of us like Mike and myself, fans of the early "group" sound, that was a source of disappointment. I remember being really angry that Karen & Richard didn't do the backing vocals on "I Can Dream, Can't I?"

    Harry
  18. newvillefan Member

    Horizon isn't one of my favourites, although it's indoubtedly a great album. It seems to lack some kind of sparkle for me that was there on the previous albums. Some adjectives that come to mind are 'dreamy', 'laboured', 'sluggish'. 'A Kind Of Hush' saw them slump even further into this state.

    Why Richard felt the need to put '(Caught Between) Goodbye and I Love You' and 'Love Me For What I Am' back to back is beyond me, they're far too similar, almost sister songs. I'd love to have seen 'Trying To Get The Feeling Again' close the album just before 'Eventide'.
  19. davidgra Member

    I'll add my voice to those who feel that HORIZON was a bit of a let-down. I've always felt that HORIZON marked the beginning of the loss of energy (for lack of a better word) from Karen and Richard's albums. It felt, well, tired.

    Part of the "tiredness" comes from the tempo of the songs -- there are a lot of slow ballads here. Part comes from the brevity of the album (only eight "real" songs plus the bookend pieces). Part of it comes from the production (lack of large-scale overdubbing). And part of it comes from the songwriting (most of the songs just don't "grab" me).

    Yes, I think that Karen sounds magnificent here. But I wish there had been better material for her to sing.

    David
  20. mstaft Member

    Love hearing the different opinions- even though I disagree... :wink:

Share This Page