Found this on Amazon. The listing is for the "tan" album, but most of the reviewers are clearly talking about the Singles 1969-1973 album, so the reviews must have gotten misplaced, but that still doesn't make these "three star" reviews of the album any less funny. This just proves that true artistry will still torque some people off... plus you gotta love the exaggerations. Poor editing??!
And here's another one, from the same listing. How is it that even a casual Carpenters fan can be so.... out of touch?
I suppose this thread can be an archive of hilariously off-track reviews that people manage to collect. Join the fun, post your finds here!
Love the music, hate the fact that only two songs can be listened to standalone, due to each song running butt-first into the next. Luckily, one of my favorites - For All We Know, is not ruined by this poor editing. Great sounding CD, if you don't mind listening to these classic's codas running into the first 10 - 20 seconds of the next song.
And here's another one, from the same listing. How is it that even a casual Carpenters fan can be so.... out of touch?
After reading the glowing reviews, bought CD. Was looking so forward to getting it, but after listening to the very first track wondered if I had gotten the wrong CD by accident. The first track "CLOSE TO YOU" was less than a few seconds - the liner notes said it should be >4 minutes. More than 1/2 the song was missing. I had a random thought that maybe the last track was really the first track - it was. Strange.
I suppose this thread can be an archive of hilariously off-track reviews that people manage to collect. Join the fun, post your finds here!