JohnFB
She was born to belong to the lines of a song...
As I mentioned above, if the reverb was generated electronically via studio equipment then it's artificial and should be removed. However, if it was reverb created by the acoustics in the recording room and/or the recording booth then it's natural and should not have been eliminated....
Half glass empty me finds Karen's vocals lacking their usual sparkle at times. Maybe it's the lack of reverb (from one extreme on Christmas Collection) to the other.
The critical thing is that if that reverb was artificially generated and if Karen needed that to have "sparkle" or depth or richness in her vocals then the hard, cold truth may just be that she wasn't quite the unique and outstanding and incomparable singer we've all thought she was all these years.
Yes, absolutely - over-processed and electronic - and unreal. If the doubling was removed from the 1990 remix then Richard finally and for once made the right decision with regard to this old, stale, trite, 50s style recording technique that never did anything to enhance Karen's naturally beautiful voice...I'm not all that keen on the effect used on Karen's vocals in one of my favourite tracks, The First Snowfall/Let It Snow, Let It Snow. When it comes to the "and it shows no sign of stoppin'" section and especially the first verse on 'Let It Snow' - they sound really over-processed and electronic to my ears...
Instead of senselessly adding it back here (thus ruining an otherwise excellent medley) he should take the hard lesson learned after all these years and go through their catalog and do the same purging on every other song where this obscene distortion was used to f**k with her voice...