RIAA's Latest Tactic: Bring On The Thugs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rudy

¡Que siga la fiesta!
Staff member
Site Admin
THis from L.A. Weekly:

http://www.laweekly.com/ink/04/07/news-sullivan.php

Music Industry Puts Troops in the Streets
Quasi-legal squads raid street vendors
by Ben Sullivan

Though no guns were brandished, the bust from a distance looked like classic LAPD, DEA or FBI work, right down to the black "raid" vests the unit members wore. The fact that their yellow stenciled lettering read "RIAA" instead of something from an official law-enforcement agency was lost on 55-year-old parking-lot attendant Ceasar Borrayo.

The Recording Industry Association of America is taking it to the streets.

Even as it suffers setbacks in the courtroom, the RIAA has over the last 18 months built up a national staff of ex-cops to crack down on people making and selling illegal CDs in the hood.

The result has been a growing number of scenes like the one played out in Silver Lake just before Christmas, during an industry blitz to combat music piracy.

Borrayo attends to a parking lot next to the landmark El 7 Mares fish-taco stand on Sunset Boulevard. To supplement his buck-a-car income, he began, in 2003, selling records and videos from a makeshift stand in front of the lot.

In a good week, Borrayo said, he might unload five or 10 albums and a couple DVDs at $5 apiece. Paying a distributor about half that up-front, he thought he’d lucked into a nice side business.

The RIAA saw it differently. Figuring the discs were bootlegs, a four-man RIAA squad descended on his stand a few days before Christmas and persuaded the 4-foot-11 Borrayo to hand over voluntarily a total of 78 discs. It wasn’t a tough sell.

"They said they were police from the recording industry or something, and next time they’d take me away in handcuffs," he said through an interpreter. Borrayo says he has no way of knowing if the records, with titles like Como Te Extraño Vol. IV — Musica de los 70’s y 80’s, are illegal, but he thought better of arguing the point.

The RIAA acknowledges it all — except the notion that its staff presents itself as police. Yes, they may all be ex-P.D. Yes, they wear cop-style clothes and carry official-looking IDs. But if they leave people like Borrayo with the impression that they’re actual law enforcement, that’s a mistake.

"We want to be very clear who we are and what we’re doing," says John Langley, Western regional coordinator for the RIAA Anti-Piracy Unit. "First and foremost, we’re professionals."

Langley, based in Los Alamitos, California, oversees five staff investigators and around 20 contractors who sniff out bootleg discs west of the Rockies. The former Royal Canadian Mountie said his unit’s on-the-streets approach has been a big success, netting more than 100,000 pieces of unauthorized merchandise during the recent Christmas retail blitz.

With all the trappings of a police team, including pink incident reports that, among other things, record a vendor’s height, weight, hair and eye color, the RIAA squad can give those busted the distinct impression they’re tangling with minions of Johnny Law instead of David Geffen. And that raises some potential legal questions.

Contacted for this article, the Southern California branch of the American Civil Liberties Union said it needed more information on the practices to know if specific civil liberties were at risk.

But if an anti-piracy team crossed the line between looking like cops and implying or telling vendors that they are cops, the Los Angeles Police Department would take a pretty dim view, said LAPD spokesman Jason Lee.

"I will not say it’s okay to be [selling] illegal stuff," Lee said. "That’s a violation of penal codes.

"But it doesn’t really matter what your status is. If that person feels he was wrongly interrogated or under the false pretense that these people were cops, they should contact their local police station as a victim. We’ll sort it all out."

For its part, the RIAA maintains that the up-close-and-personal techniques are nothing new. RIAA spokesman Jonathan Lamy says its investigators do not represent themselves as police, and that the incident reports vendors are asked to sign, in which they agree to hand over their discs, explicitly state that the forfeiture is voluntary.

Lamy and the RIAA are unapologetic about taking the fight against music piracy to the streets. Though the association has suffered a few high-profile legal setbacks in recent months — most notably when a three-judge panel ruled that Internet service providers do not have to squeal on their file-swapping customers — community action is extremely effective.

Langley says the anti-piracy teams have about an 80 percent success rate in persuading vendors to hand over their merchandise voluntarily for destruction.

"We notify them that continued sale would be a violation of civil and criminal codes. If they’d like to voluntarily turn the product over to us, we’ll destroy it, and we agree we won’t sue," he explained.

The pink incident sheets and photos that Langley’s teams take of vendors are meant to establish a paper trail, particularly for repeat offenders.

"A large percentage [of the vendors] are of a Hispanic nature," Langley said. "Today he’s Jose Rodriguez, tomorrow he’s Raul something or other, and tomorrow after that he’s something else. These people change their identity all the time. A picture’s worth a thousand words."

Though Langley says he doesn’t know what tack his new boss will take, the recent hiring of Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Director Bradley Buckles to head the anti-piracy unit has some RIAA watchers holding their breath.

On its face, the move looks like a shift toward even more in-your-face enforcement. But don’t expect all RIAA critics to rally to the side of Borrayo and other sellers.

"The process of confiscating bootleg CDs from street vendors is exactly what the RIAA should be doing," said Jason Schultz, a staff attorney for the San Francisco–based Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).

The EFF has frequently crossed swords with the record industry over its strategy of suing ISPs and individual listeners accused of downloading tunes from the Internet. A champion of copyright "fair use," the EFF says Buckles could bring a more balanced approach to the RIAA’s anti-piracy efforts. The more time the association spends rousting vendors, the thinking goes, the less it will spend subpoenaing KaZaa and BearShare aficionados.

Meanwhile, Borrayo will have to keep his eyes open for another source of income. Though he says he still sees nothing wrong with what he did, the guy who once supplied him records hasn’t been around in a couple months.

"They tried to scare me," Borrayo said. "They told me, ‘You’re a pirate!’ I said, ‘C’mon, guys, pirates are all at sea. I just work in a parking lot.’ "

Interesting. Racial/ethnic profiling, citizens masquerading as officers of the law. As if the PR nightmare of suing 12-year-olds wasn't enough for them! Just shows how desperate the RIAA has become.
 
"A large percentage [of the vendors] are of a Hispanic nature," Langley said. "Today he’s Jose Rodriguez, tomorrow he’s Raul something or other, and tomorrow after that he’s something else. These people change their identity all the time. A picture’s worth a thousand words."


Try that kind of attitude in the UK and you'd be pilloried as a blatant racist. One of our popular TV presenters made a remark about Arab States in his newapaper column (by mistake, in fact, because his secretary emailed an old text to the newspaper) and 24 hours later his daily TV show is off the air indefinitely. We simply don't tolerate sweeping generalisations about any ethic group, and quite rightly so.

As Mussolini said, "Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism as it is a merger of state and corporate power."
 
The part of their tactics not being new seem to ring true. We had an infamous store here,Toones,that went so far as taking weekly newspaper ads with sale prices of bootleg material(he also took some space in Goldmine under the mail order name "Tunes"). This was guilt in black & white. Along comes RIAA with state revenue agents,guns a shinin',to take his register and illegal goods found in the store. But the gang that couldn't shoot straight screwed up the search warrant papers and everything was thrown out. Here was a case of a bad guy doing bad things and the agents had to return the bad guys' computer and apologize. Mac
 
TonyCurrie said:
Try that kind of attitude in the UK and you'd be pilloried as a blatant racist. One of our popular TV presenters made a remark about Arab States in his newapaper column (by mistake, in fact, because his secretary emailed an old text to the newspaper) and 24 hours later his daily TV show is off the air indefinitely. We simply don't tolerate sweeping generalisations about any ethic group, and quite rightly so.

The American media should be that way, IMHO. Instead, they'd rather toss an issue like this around to try and extract every bit of cable TV ratings out of it, bringing on commentators, experts, etc...whatever they could throw at it.

I know a lot of citizens (myself included) are much more intolerant of this kind of profiling than our wonderful :rolleyes: media would suggest. The RIAA, though, should be finding themselves in a lot of hot water over the way they are dealing with this. It just looks like desperation, and another looming public relations disaster in the making. How anyone can take them seriously after their most recent blunders just amazes me. :wink:
 
Rudy said:
I know a lot of citizens (myself included) are much more intolerant of this kind of profiling than our wonderful :rolleyes: media would suggest.

I have to disagree (and why not as we head into this political season*). I think most Americans don't really give a crap and the media itself (as well as special interest groups who can make a dime by maintaining a "repressed" status) are the ones who make a bigger deal about this sort of stuff. Trouble is some people don't want to hear the truth whien it's not favorable (ie: "when the truth hurts"). This is why someone like Rush Limbaugh gets fired for saying a player (who happens not to be of Limbaugh's race) is "not performing as well as he has in the past."
*LPJim and I have already chatted about how sad it'll be without Wendell this time...

I can't speak for the UK, but here in America the issues are not "abortion," "gay rights," "drug legalization," "welfare," "equal rights," "single parent issues" or "taxes" -- if you look at the roots of ALL these issues the real issue is: PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.

People need to take responsibility for themselves and more importantly their actions. Blaming your lot in life on others or situations beyond your control is shirking your own responsibiltiy to yourself, your family, your community and (dare I say it) God. I've been to LA and I've seen those stands that sell "questionable CDs and DVDs." Virtually all of them are run by latinos. Am I a racist for pointing that out? I suppose I should go to prison for suggesting that many of said vendors are in California illegally?

Putting that "personal responsibility" perspective on just some of the issues I pointed out above... Abortion: legalized abortion is a way to shirk responsibility for getting pregnant. Pro-choice? You made your choice when you spread your legs. Equal Rights for Gays: My gay friends and I get into heated debates on this. They want the "equal right" to marry. They already have it -- I have the right to marry someone of the opposite sex and they have the right to marry someone of the opposite sex. Drug legalization: While I agree with the most of the Libertarian party's views, this is one I don't embrace -- people will still screw up their lives with drugs, legal or not. However legalization eliminates the need to take responsibilty for screwing up your life or "breaking the law."

I could go on for hours and I've danced extremely close to FAO territory (Danced, hell -- I'm soaking in it!) and it likely should now move to FAO. Oh well... Sorry. :wink:

Bottom line -- the media (at least here in America) is responsible for taking the lead in convincing people not to take responsibilty for their actions. The news, pop culture and more daily try to convince "it's not our fault" when by and large it really is... deal with it.

--Mr Bill
"diga no a la pirateria" -- the slogan on virtually all latin recordings, where piracy is a bigger problem than the RIAA would want to handle...
 
TonyCurrie said:
"A large percentage [of the vendors] are of a Hispanic nature," Langley said. "Today he’s Jose Rodriguez, tomorrow he’s Raul something or other, and tomorrow after that he’s something else. These people change their identity all the time. A picture’s worth a thousand words."


Try that kind of attitude in the UK and you'd be pilloried as a blatant racist. One of our popular TV presenters made a remark about Arab States in his newapaper column (by mistake, in fact, because his secretary emailed an old text to the newspaper) and 24 hours later his daily TV show is off the air indefinitely. We simply don't tolerate sweeping generalisations about any ethic group, and quite rightly so.

As Mussolini said, "Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism as it is a merger of state and corporate power."
In that context, the RIAA's unfortunate policy of suing ordinary consumers - i.e. college students, 12-year-old girls, 79-year-old geezers who don't even have computers - into the poorhouse (read: extortion/coercion/blackmail/shakedown) could be seen as smacking of "political correctness." Yet given the fact that they have a huge amount of friends in Congress, the courts, the news media, and academia, it certainly proves Mussolini's quoted definition of "fascism."

And I read somewhere that radio talk-show host Phil Hendrie suggested that the real reason for that "sue-'em-all" strategy was so the executives could continue to snort cocaine in the back of limousines, and so forth. For all the RIAA's "collective guilt" strategy against consumers, their tactics in that regard were almost like a duo of armed robbers barging into a family's house, hog-tying every member of the family with a gun pointed to their heads while the other cases the joint. Or a drug-addicted "black sheep" of the family stealing from their parents or siblings so they could continue to support their habit.

Where I live in New York City, I've seen pirated CD's and DVD's sold on the streets of busy areas like Herald Square -- and the times I was out and about, I saw police looking around but not doing anything. May have something to do with the whole "racial profiling" business and its aftermath.
 
Mr Bill said:
Rudy said:
I know a lot of citizens (myself included) are much more intolerant of this kind of profiling than our wonderful :rolleyes: media would suggest.

I have to disagree (and why not as we head into this political season*). I think most Americans don't really give a crap and the media itself

I'm talking more on a personal level. What the quote in that article does is basically slur an ethnic group, and I, and most people I am friends with, have a big problem with that and don't like to hear it. And the RIAA creates itself another PR nightmare. As much as I hate the American media, let them have a field day with it; they seem to operate at the same IQ level as the RIAA lately. :laugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom