Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Steven J. Gross said:Since the label was sold, resold, etc., and being that it stands for Alpert and Moss, is there any reason it should still be used (other than contract fulfillment)?
Well, apart from Warner Brothers Records (a relative newcomer to the industry), almost no label is under the same ownership or represents the same philosophy as when it began.
ThaFunkyFakeTation said:Verve has also come back in a big way - thanks in no small part to Jamie Cullum.
Mike Blakesly said:Michael Hagerty said:Well, apart from Warner Brothers Records (a relative newcomer to the industry), almost no label is under the same ownership or represents the same philosophy as when it began. And, given that Warners has itself gone through ownership changes while maintaining the Warner name, it doesn't really count, either.
Are you saying Warner Bros. is still owned by Warner Bros.? Sorry, but it was bought out by Time Inc. and then both companies were bought by AOL, becoming the megaconglomerate AOL Time Warner.
Michael Hagerty said:Mike Blakesly said:Michael Hagerty said:Well, apart from Warner Brothers Records (a relative newcomer to the industry), almost no label is under the same ownership or represents the same philosophy as when it began. And, given that Warners has itself gone through ownership changes while maintaining the Warner name, it doesn't really count, either.
Are you saying Warner Bros. is still owned by Warner Bros.? Sorry, but it was bought out by Time Inc. and then both companies were bought by AOL, becoming the megaconglomerate AOL Time Warner.
Mike B., If you'd quoted my entire paragraph, you'd see that I addressed the ownership change at Warners. Somehow, your quote stopped one sentence too soon.