Andrew T.
New Member
One detail of records on the A&M label that catches my eye is the logo that identifies them. The A&M logo itself is a classic piece of work, and has had a number of subtle and significant tweaks over the years:
Here are the respective poll choices, from left to right:
My own favorite would have to be the original version with the border (which appeared on so many great records over the years), but I quite like the squarish 1984 version (also in my avatar) as well. A&M, I think, did a superb job of simplifying and modernizing its logo without changing it around too much (which is more than could be said for labels like Elektra and Epic!). Additionally, Gill Sans just looks good.
The 1996 version I could do without: It seemed anachronistic to revert to the pre-1984 logo's proportions and embellishments when the 1984 logo still looked up-to-date, and the modern, blocky typeface improvised for "Records" looks very out-of-place in my opinion.
Here are the respective poll choices, from left to right:
My own favorite would have to be the original version with the border (which appeared on so many great records over the years), but I quite like the squarish 1984 version (also in my avatar) as well. A&M, I think, did a superb job of simplifying and modernizing its logo without changing it around too much (which is more than could be said for labels like Elektra and Epic!). Additionally, Gill Sans just looks good.
The 1996 version I could do without: It seemed anachronistic to revert to the pre-1984 logo's proportions and embellishments when the 1984 logo still looked up-to-date, and the modern, blocky typeface improvised for "Records" looks very out-of-place in my opinion.