Rick-An Ordinary Fool
Well-Known Member
I think you can drive your self crazy over this stuff. I mean what kind of grammar is B’wana She No Home and why are we feeding deer at the door?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think you can drive your self crazy over this stuff. I mean what kind of grammar is B’wana She No Home and why are we feeding deer at the door?
I'm sure you're right. Sadly, I have this editor in my brain that doesn't care about a detail like that and just won't shut up. It's the curse of writing for a living. Every little thing gets edited! The missing noun and verb caught my attention and never let go.I've always noticed it and it's always very slightly bothered me too. It's grammatically incorrect. However, with "I'm", it just doesn't "meter" as well. That's likely why it was left out.
Ed
I agree, that would have worked! I wonder why they didn't go that route instead. It's possible that for Karen it was a vocal-sound choice ("and" sounding more appealing to her than "I'm").They could have just left out the "And" at the front of that line. "I'm fool enough to think that's what I'll find." Then it would have the right number of syllables and make sense lyrically. But, it wouldn't flow as well with the line ahead of it.
Richard liked the tune but he didn’t care to do gospel. A&M wouldn’t have gone for it either. As a result, “the words have an empty ring / and they don’t really mean a thing.” Richard basically rewrote the tune and made it fun.One song most transformed in both the lyric and meaning is Love Is Surrender. The second verse was completely omitted.
The original Ralph Carmichael:
"Talk about love
how it makes life complete
You can talk all you want
make it sound good and sweet,
But the words have an empty ring,
and they don't really mean a thing,
Chorus:
Without Him love is not to be found;
not to be found.
For love is surrender,
Love is surrender to His will
Love is surrender to His will
Sing about love
and the strength it can give
You can sing how you're ready
to face life and live,
But you know as the days go by
that no matter how hard you try,
Chorus
Shout about love
and the wars will all end
You can shout we're all brothers
and even pretend
But you can't cover up the past
just pretending we'll never last"
- - -
Did anyone else mentally visualise the second verse in Karen's (or Richard's) voice?
Richard and Karen's version of "Solitaire" also includes a different chorus from the Neil Sedaka version.
Agreed. Carpenters' lyric is far more effective here. This feels like math to me. This also "meters" better.And keeping to himself, begins to deal
And still the king of hearts is well concealed
Another losing games comes to an end
And deals them out again is overdoing the card game theme, I think. It’s just too much.
It changes the meaning of the passage so whatever the reason was, it should have been corrected. With rare exception, I'm not much on changing artistic intent when it comes to lyrical revision. This is such a case and it should have been fixed at the time it was recorded. Yeah, I know it wasn't intended for commercial release this way but someone was clearly intended to hear it and it wouldn't have taken but a minute or two to fix.‘California Dreaming’ by Mamas and Papas:-
‘…got down on my knees and pretend to pray’.
Carpenters:-
‘…got down on my knees and began to pray’.
Richard addresses this somewhere, (probably in the liner notes for ‘As Time Goes By’)
Whatever reason Karen changed the lyrics, (I think it’s probably just a common mis-hearing of the Mamas and Papas because I also always thought they sang ‘…began to pray’), she did change the lyrics to a more grammatically correct form, (for those of you by this).
‘…pretend to pray’ was written after certain members of the Mamas and Papas had run into a church just to get out of a freezing cold storm. Just to appease the caretakers of the church, they pretended to pray, so that they wouldn’t get thrown out into the cold again. (I can’t remember where I read that).
Having said that, I just read this:- Michelle Phillips wrote the lyrics, "Well, I got down on my knees, and I pretend to pray," but Cass Elliot had sung "began" on the original recording and had continued doing so on tour until corrected by Phillips.
I agree with your comments about both poetic intent and grammar in songs, Ed.It changes the meaning of the passage so whatever the reason was, it should have been corrected. With rare exception, I'm not much on changing artistic intent when it comes to lyrical revision. This is such a case and it should have been fixed at the time it was recorded. Yeah, I know it wasn't intended for commercial release this way but someone was clearly intended to hear it and it wouldn't have taken but a minute or two to fix.
Also gotta add that song lyrics aren't poetry and visa versa. Lyrics are not the primary place to worry about grammar. Leave that to term papers and books. Sometimes, something can be grammatically incorrect but it feels right. In song lyrics, that's what matters most.
Ed
Altering it after the fact would be downright apocryphal, though with AI, it could now be done. Still, it could have been dealt with at the time and that's more or less what I'm dickering over. Not a huge deal or anything but it would have been nice.I agree with your comments about both poetic intent and grammar in songs, Ed.
As you’ve suggested, ‘..began to pray..’ probably wasn’t changed because it was just Karen at 17 mucking around in a studio. She probably only ever sang the song through once. Also, her vocal in that section was so angelic and perfect that it would have been a crime to alter it.
When many song lyrics are printed separately from the musical notation they very often look like poetry, and sound like poetry, and could reasonably be assumed to be poetry - yes, simple poetry of a specific type, but poetry nevertheless......
Also gotta add that song lyrics aren't poetry and visa versa. Lyrics are not the primary place to worry about grammar. Leave that to term papers and books. Sometimes, something can be grammatically incorrect but it feels right. In song lyrics, that's what matters most.
Ed
Possibly for reasons similar to her changing "sleep with you" to "be with you", or "crapped out" to "crashed out". She may not have been comfortable with the original lyric - the idea of "pretending" to pray. Don't forget that Karen was raised in the Methodist church, and at 16 years-old, may still have attended services with her parents. I don't know how old some of you are, but I still remember the reaction people at church had over John Lennon's "Imagine"... "Imagine there's no heaven" - now why would anyone want to do that, other than drugged-out, atheist, commie hippies like John Lennon!I know other examples, Nancy Sinatra's recording from 1970 for example (which was also performed on Ed Sullivan), where "Began" rather than "pretend" is sung.
I've always picked up on this difference and wondered what the reason behind it was... I personally don't think there's any ambiguity in hearing the Mammas and the Pappas recording. It sounds clearly like "pretend".